Jump to content

CV-19 Discussion


Richard Bernau

Recommended Posts

🙄

The response is disproportionate and misguided. We should doubly look after those that are vulnerable and spend our money there. Not close down society in general to stop the likes of you and me getting it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 344
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The number of people dying in Italy because of covid-19 means that 20% more people are dying in Italy every day than would normally be the case, and the death rate from covid-19 is increasing.

The best thing we can all do is to stay within our homes and only go out if absolutely necessary i.e for for food for at least the next 12 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Busybee said:

🙄

The response is disproportionate and misguided. We should doubly look after those that are vulnerable and spend our money there. Not close down society in general to stop the likes of you and me getting it. 

Expand on this please with specifics. Throwing rocks at the current approach is easy - articulate a better plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sopor said:

Expand on this please with specifics. Throwing rocks at the current approach is easy - articulate a better plan.

We already seem to have a model. China. With a little more compassion.
Support for the elderly and vulnerable within their homes. Grocery deliveries free of charge. Sanitisers, vitamin supplements.They are the ones that need protecting. Not 35 year old Brenda working in John Lewis who will now go home and get 80% of her salary funded from the public purse for the next x weeks. The current response is aimed at giving the most to those that need it least! We should be pushing the most to those that are likely to suffer the most serious consequences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Busybee said:

🙄

The response is disproportionate and misguided. We should doubly look after those that are vulnerable and spend our money there. Not close down society in general to stop the likes of you and me getting it. 

And going to fail all the time there are 'doesn't affect me so I'll just carry on as normal' attitudes like this ^^^^^ 🙄

Edited by GaryH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GaryH said:

And going to fail all the time there are 'doesn't affect me so I'll just carry on as normal' attitudes like this ^^^^^ 🙄

You’re unfortunately, missing the point. Grab a cuppa and go back a few posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Busybee said:

You’re unfortunately, missing the point. Grab a cuppa and go back a few posts. 

Oh I don't think comprehension is my problem. 

I suppose I  shouldn't be surprised, this was the supermarket beer aisle.. 

...all gone, except for, yes you guessed it.... 😒 - FFS

IMG_20200321_154942_01.jpg

8 hours ago, Busybee said:

Is that more draconian than what’s happening? 

Really! ? is that a serious question ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to note that Boris Johnson thought the real hero in the film "Jaws" was the local major who kept the beaches open (whilst people continued to get eaten by the shark) in order to protect local commerce ! 😮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t really want to contribute to this trash fire of a thread. But if you’ve listened to any of the interviews with front line doctors it’s pretty terrifying.

Yes the older more vulnerable are dying, but there are 30-40 year olds that are requiring ventilation for weeks at a time, will likely need to be in hospitalised for a while and require medication for a year afterwards. 

There is more to it than the headline death numbers. 

Yes there is some sensationalisation going on, but it’s being taken this seriously for a reason.  The Italian doctors being interviewed are trying to warn us of what’s coming.

Next week is going to be very telling on how this pans out. 

Edited by Northy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you’re missing a major point. It’s not just about the mortality of CV. It’s the load it places on the health service.

Just because you and I might well not die of the disease doesn’t mean we won’t spend time in hospital on a respirator. Or consume other NHS resources. One statistic I saw stated that the median hospital stay for patients that survive is 10 days. What tiny fraction of the general non-vulnerable population needs to spend 10 days in hospital before the beds are full?

There are also concerns of long term lung damage.

If you look at the current statistics for western nations the percentage of people deemed recovered is quite low - presumably they’re still using up health resources in varying degrees?

So keeping Brenda from getting ill in the first place might be a good idea? Or, should Brenda get ill this week, hopefully her sister Sarah won’t get ill in the same week too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government would consider an Italian-style lockdown if people fail to follow advice to stay at home during the coronavirus crisis, a senior minister has said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if you’re shouting or you think cv has debilitated my eyes Felix Lol. Hospitals are always at capacity or near to it. That’s their natural state of being or we waste money in the system every day. 10 additional cases requiring ventilation is above natural capacity. Any out of the ordinary influence tips them over. It usually happens every year at this time because the elderly become ill with flu. I agree that this will need more resources than normal but I don’t agree the response being offered fits the threat.

You’re a numbers man. Take a look at the stats you found. Over 90% of cases suffer mild to moderate symptoms requiring nothing more than a stay at home. Very few people outside of the vulnerable brackets require intervention. Even then it’s usually because they have an underlying illness. You can’t ignore the science and give in to the media hype. Protect the vulnerable and throw as much resource as we can to them. Brenda will be fine with chicken soup. 90% of the time! 
I’m just watching with  interest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government would consider an Italian-style lockdown if people fail to follow advice to stay at home during the coronavirus crisis, a senior minister has said.

"We want to continue in a free society. But this isn’t a game, people need to follow the advice" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Busybee said:

You’re a numbers man. Take a look at the stats you found. Over 90% of cases suffer mild to moderate symptoms requiring nothing more than a stay at home.

So, pop quiz. 

What's 10% of 49 million people (that would need hospital treatment) ? 

Or even 2% ? 

See the problem now ? 

 

_20200322_100318.JPG

Edited by GaryH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the earlier large font. Cut and paste error on my part and the edit window for posts on this site is short.

10% of 4.9M is bad enough. Even 10% of 0.49M will cause problems. The UK has some 170K hospital beds in total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I

22 minutes ago, GaryH said:

The government would consider an Italian-style lockdown if people fail to follow advice to stay at home during the coronavirus crisis, a senior minister has said.

I think that they can proceed with full lockdown in that case. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you're right; I am a numbers man. The perils of a maths degree.

When I see the numbers/graphs in these pages:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/spain/

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/

I get to thinking there's little reason the UK won't soon be on a similar trajectory. Why should we be any different? All indications are that even with a draconian lock-down cases will continue to climb for some time since the incubation period is so long.

I'm surprised that you're coming to a conclusion about the rights and wrongs of the government's approach so early. This thing has quite some way to run yet me thinks. There's no vaccine on the horizon and there's not enough empirical evidence that once you've had it you'll never get it again. It's in the wild and it's not going away. At the moment it's looking far too much like a perpetual game of Whac-a-Mole with rather higher stakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, don't lose sight of the fact this is a car forum, all your points/discussions/recriminations make no material difference to anything except the level of depression.

IMHO, on this forum it is better to talk about positive IB things we can do without any potential risk to others :twocents:

 

Social distancing IB style...

81895424_March20202.thumb.jpg.c17d7219dc39265f8516215f89ddca7d.jpg

Isolated drive, with a quick photo stop I guessed would have more than adequate opportunity for effective social distancing.

Keep well,

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Girlfriends sister and her husband stopped by gendarmes whilst going out in France to buy food and told that only one of them is supposed to be outside at a time.

51 minutes ago, sopor said:

And you're right; I am a numbers man. The perils of a maths degree.

When I see the numbers/graphs in these pages:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/spain/

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/

I get to thinking there's little reason the UK won't soon be on a similar trajectory. Why should we be any different? All indications are that even with a draconian lock-down cases will continue to climb for some time since the incubation period is so long.

I'm surprised that you're coming to a conclusion about the rights and wrongs of the government's approach so early. This thing has quite some way to run yet me thinks. There's no vaccine on the horizon and there's not enough empirical evidence that once you've had it you'll never get it again. It's in the wild and it's not going away. At the moment it's looking far too much like a perpetual game of Whac-a-Mole with rather higher stakes.

All of this ^^^^^ 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SilverWT said:

Guys, don't lose sight of the fact this is a car forum, all your points/discussions/recriminations make no material difference to anything except the level of depression.

IMHO, on this forum it is better to talk about positive IB things we can do without any potential risk to others :twocents:

 

Social distancing IB style...

81895424_March20202.thumb.jpg.c17d7219dc39265f8516215f89ddca7d.jpg

Typical Porsche driver - taking up two spaces! 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...