Jump to content
Impact Bumpers
Dr Rock

Another day: another dyno

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, longman said:

180bhp I reckon , done a million miles that old crapper  :) 

Ha! It’s not a 3.4....:cry:

Place your bets, gentlemen....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Warp factor 5 Mr sulu,  engage.........................

254.....................

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s excellent Richard, was a good day 

Saved the best to last I see 

Fraser - you had done since then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was 4 years ago before Fraser’s engine build so lots been done since then!

Still chuffed I was the best of the NAs that’s day 😎 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The suspense is killin' us....................................I'm sticking with 254

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Wingnonut said:

That was 4 years ago before Fraser’s engine build so lots been done since then!

Still chuffed I was the best of the NAs that’s day 😎 

Still chuffed my old smoker Beemer didn’t let me down -225 I think it hit

 

459D0C16-35B2-468F-9467-4786510B21D5.jpeg

9 minutes ago, Beaky said:

The suspense is killin' us....................................I'm sticking with 254

I’m guessing he’s happy with it otherwise he wouldn’t have started the thread :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll put you all out of your misery then. Mr F1 I think has spent too much time in Italy with their imaginary horses....:P

Standard 3.2 with 993SS cams, SSI’s , standard induction and some secret skunkworks internal mods, gives a grand total of.....

HP Sauce: 260

Torx: 230

Wayne tweaked the fuelling again and now the engine idles better and has, dare I say it, a bit more ‘zing’...

 

Well ‘appy :signs85:

Edited by Dr Rock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Nige we were both 2 away! What's the prize Fraser? 260 is pretty darn good for a 3.2 innit? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

👏

Excellent for a 3.2, and I think backs up the use of SSIs on these engines.

I wonder if a standard 3.2 exhaust would have delivered more peak bhp? I think SSIs perhaps elongate the torque curve to start earlier in the range but ultimately hit the same peak figure as a standard setup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hubba hubba :) Wait till they get it sorted. Are you expecting much of an uplift? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...